Det kunne være et fortræffelig godt diskotek her på Jorden, hvis De (politikere) ikke stod i krogene og diskuterede dansetrin i stedet for at bevise, hvordan man danser sammen. P-r-Ø-v.

Det er frustrerende at se det boyband af præsidenter stå og diskutere krudt og kugler i stedet for at de besøger slagmarken og selv observerer, hvad det gør omkring de beslutninger, de foretager sig. DET SLÅR IHJEL. 1. DU MÅ IKKE SLÅ IHJEL. Hvornår fatter De det? En præsidents fornemste opgave er at skabe fred, sgu da ikke det modsatte. Det kan ikke tilgives. At de tror, de er hellige og får magt af den grund, må være deres egen misforståede egoisme, der slår dem i hovedet. Det er lige modsat, man mister alt respekt. Især over for Gud (mennesker, red. (har aldrig hørt en elefant be til Gud)), når man gang på gang træder på hans bud om, hvordan man bedst behandler mennesker i omgangen med hinanden. Læs 'De 10 Bud' og overhold dem, for engang skyld selv. Det har jeg altid gjort.

From a personal subjective perspective. God is our human body. Christianity bad? What about Islam? Muslims. They are far worse than Christianity. They wear scarves to show attitude, rebellion, and to flash they're false beliefs about diversity. They're some sort of fake news. They can't really figure out it's the same: God is a God; Christians are just non-personal, while Muslims are personal and call the same 'Allah' that is a God; he (a Lord) is the same, same.

But they try to argue with people who stand out by not eating pigs (introducing kebab) and tell others how bad Western countries are, who accepted your entrance when you fled your countries with a war behind to give you peace and a home, while it's their own shit they deal with in those war-torn countries. The Western countries come, solve, and take out the weapons they try to produce to take over the world because of their egos. Just because they feel pity about something they didn't have in the first place anyway.

Otherwise, they're supposed to produce oil and harvest resources if they claim we take it out. We haven't, and their states are dealing with the economy with Western Countries to make money. They have shits and dimes, nothing. Only their leaders. Cause they always argue about who is in control. They (politicians) take up the talking time on air(on the bonin floors they don't let their people speak to solve their problems) from the citizens by polluting the air with their false politics and paperwork, while moving their armies instead of helping each other for a freaking paperwork. They should support the poor and make the rich pay for the party.

They really have a big pond of bad excuses from their so-called tears about how much they lost, even though they always had nothing. They ought to introduce their citizens to taxes, politics that ain't corrupt, and a police force that doesn't accept bribes because they're too poor themselves. Lift the whole society instead of living in a dusty ocean of sand with the beliefs of Aladdin and Princesses, oil and richness - they never had. We have that on Cartoon Network for entertainment purposes in Western Countries for that sake.

So where is it? Where is the stuff these so-called Western Countries been thieving? How the hell are we supposed to suck a country dry of resources? It's not doable. They live in fiction. One would think they believe Santa Claus came and the kids lost their presents. Thank your leaders for your sucky economy and military failures instead of progress through cooperation. Too sad, really.

 

It doesn't upset me the slightest. There's religious freedom. But, not if you ask the Muslims.

 

Some chatgpt.com

Religion, Politics, and Responsibility: A Personal Perspective

From my personal and subjective perspective, religion should never become a shield against criticism. Christianity, Islam, and every other belief system should be open to the same level of public scrutiny. No ideology should be exempt from questioning simply because it is widely followed or considered sacred.

One point that often goes unnoticed is that Christianity and Islam share common Abrahamic origins. Christians refer to God, while Muslims use the Arabic word "Allah," which simply means "God." Despite significant theological differences, both traditions ultimately worship the same monotheistic Creator as understood within their respective doctrines. Yet public debate often emphasizes division instead of acknowledging these historical and linguistic connections.

My greater concern lies not with ordinary believers but with the political exploitation of religion. Across history, governments and powerful organizations have repeatedly used religious identity to strengthen authority, justify conflicts, or divide populations. When religion becomes a political instrument rather than a personal conviction, it can discourage open discussion and make compromise increasingly difficult.

Immigration and integration are also legitimate subjects for public debate. Societies that provide safety, legal protection, and opportunities naturally expect newcomers to respect the laws, democratic institutions, and social norms of their new home. At the same time, criticism of Western societies should be accompanied by an honest examination of the political and economic failures that contributed to instability in countries of origin. Sustainable progress requires accountability from every side rather than assigning blame exclusively to external actors.

Many developing nations possess significant natural resources, yet resource wealth alone does not guarantee prosperity. Economic growth depends on stable institutions, transparent governance, effective taxation, independent courts, professional law enforcement, and political systems capable of limiting corruption. Where these institutions are weak, wealth often becomes concentrated among political elites while ordinary citizens experience little improvement in their quality of life.

It is therefore more productive to focus criticism on corruption, authoritarian governance, and institutional failure than on religion itself. Citizens deserve governments that invest in education, infrastructure, healthcare, economic opportunity, and the rule of law instead of allowing ideological conflicts or political rivalries to dominate public life.

In my view, lasting prosperity is not achieved through blaming foreign societies or preserving historical grievances. It is achieved through cooperation, responsible leadership, accountable institutions, and a willingness to confront domestic problems honestly. Progress begins when governments prioritize the well-being of their citizens over political prestige, ideological division, or the pursuit of power.